Re:San Francisco cops pull over a Cruise driverless car for ...
by MereInterest on Monday April 11, 2022 @09:03AM
(#30988081)
Speed, yes, but efficiency is questionable. Efficiency depends both on how fast you're traveling, but also on how far you need to travel in order to reach a destination. With minimum parking requirements, the space required for a shop increases drastically. If there's one shop every 50 feet, you can efficiently visit them at low speeds. If there's one shop every quarter mile, walking past a row of shops is impossible. The car traveling 40 mph can go at a faster speed than a pedestrian, but it also requires the shops to be spaced out such that the car can park. Optimizing for speed reduces efficiency.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:San Francisco cops pull over a Cruise driverless car for ...
by MathCodeLove on Monday April 11, 2022 @09:06AM
(#30988111)
Not necessarily. This assessment forgets things like sidewalks. I don't think anyone is going to visit shops on main street and every time they leave a shop drives 5 feet further down the road only to park and visit another one. In tightly clustered areas it's most common to park and then walk via a sidewalk to other destinations on the area.