News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TED: David S. Rose on pitching to VCs by DenisM on Saturday September 20, 2008 @01:30AM (#309752)
I noticed that some VCs insist on knowing your background (like this one) while some say (like Kawasaki) says that they couldn't care less about you and only care about the problem and solution.

The funny thing is that both are very patronizing about it, as if theirs is the only true way.

Re:TED: David S. Rose on pitching to VCs by davidsrose on Sunday September 28, 2008 @03:18AM (#317488)
If a VC cares only about the problem and solution, what does that say about how much they want to invest in YOU? Not much. Most early stage investors (like me) have no choice but to 'bet the jockey, not the horse', because we are betting on YOU to take something that barely exists and go to the ends of the earth to make something of it.

In a later stage deal, such as a private equity acquisition, we're investing in the existing company: its cash flow, operations, customers, etc. The CEO is less important, because we can get rid of him/her if necessary and put someone else in. Is that the way you'd like us to think of YOUR deal?

Re:TED: David S. Rose on pitching to VCs by DenisM on Sunday October 19, 2008 @01:03AM (#336916)
All I ask is to be easy on the poor entrepreneur about his choice of {himself, subject} because he can't read your mind. :)

Myself, I'm not sure I prefer invetment in me or my idea. There are pros and cons both ways.