Re:Firefox DNS-over-HTTPS
by malnourish on Friday April 08, 2022 @12:15PM
(#30959034)
Referring to Reuters as a propaganda outlet seems like a bold statement; what evidence led you to make that claim?
I could turn the question around, what evidence do you have they aren't?
I'm not going to search for every single article. Or are you seriously suggesting that Reuters is 100% free of propaganda, especially in war times?
The answer your question: "common sense".
> I could turn the question around, what evidence do you have they aren't?
I don't care about either side of this argument, but you can't logically turn the question around. The burden of proof is on you, who made the claim.
Re:Firefox DNS-over-HTTPS
by malnourish on Friday April 08, 2022 @05:45PM
(#30962888)
That is an unsatisfying and fallacious response. I did not make that claim, nor did I call them a propaganda outlet. For whom are they propagandizing?
How is this different from just using different DNS settings on your OS?
Because your ISP can block a "raw" DNS request, regardless of what server you configure. Your ISP can even inspect your DNS request, and choose to give a fake response or block the request based on the domain you are requesting.
Re:Firefox DNS-over-HTTPS
by drexlspivey on Friday April 08, 2022 @11:38AM
(#30958571)
Your ISP can also block the IP via reverse DNS if they want too.. If you don’t trust your ISP only a vpn will save you
The German Grundgesetz (constitution) says "eine Zensur findet nicht statt" (censorship does not occur/there will be no censorship) yet, there is censorship.
I was sceptical about DOH in general (why do we need this?) but now I see why this can be a good thing and great as well that Firefox supports it so easily.