News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Dart language. Parent comment

Re:Dart language by maratd on Monday October 10, 2011 @03:41PM (#3095426)
This was advertised as a replacement for JavaScript. It turned out to be a replacement for GWT. False advertising. I'm wasting time reading specs and code samples and comments just to figure that out. I don't like being misled or wasting time.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dart language by beej71 on Monday October 10, 2011 @11:55PM (#3097031)
I'm curious what you thought a JavaScript replacement would look like. Apparently you thought it /wouldn't/ look like GWT.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dart language by culebron on Tuesday October 11, 2011 @05:07AM (#3097811)
Python has a great, clean, compact and expressive syntax and a lot of syntactic sugar. Erlang does concurrency and error handling well. A mix of the two would be a great language to work with.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dart language by maratd on Tuesday October 11, 2011 @10:29AM (#3098680)
JavaScript - the ugly + OO + update to the standard library. That's it. Essentially what frameworks like MooTools try to make it into.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dart language by beej71 on Tuesday October 11, 2011 @01:07PM (#3099380)
Ah. I think I was getting caught up in the idea that a "replacement" was something completely different and not an evolution change in JavaScript. But it's all just a matter of terminology at that point.
[ Parent | on HN ]