Re:‘Housing in ‘07 wasn’t a bubble” is a true statement that...
by LinAGKar on Friday April 08, 2022 @02:24AM
(#30953905)
Probably because it's mostly desert
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:‘Housing in ‘07 wasn’t a bubble” is a true statement that...
by csee on Friday April 08, 2022 @02:46AM
(#30954020)
No. The non-desert land per capita in Australia is more than twice that in the US.
Re:‘Housing in ‘07 wasn’t a bubble” is a true statement that...
by sumedh on Friday April 08, 2022 @08:50AM
(#30956213)
Its not just desert, it about water as well. If I not mistaken large parts of Australia had drought in the last couple of years.
Re:‘Housing in ‘07 wasn’t a bubble” is a true statement that...
by loeg on Friday April 08, 2022 @02:57AM
(#30954089)
So is California. And Texas.
Re:‘Housing in ‘07 wasn’t a bubble” is a true statement that...
by rozenmd on Friday April 08, 2022 @02:30AM
(#30953935)
It is, and yet we still only really live in three cities (150km in length along a 26000km long coastline)
Re:‘Housing in ‘07 wasn’t a bubble” is a true statement that...
by dmurray on Friday April 08, 2022 @05:39AM
(#30955083)
Three cities (presumably Sydney/Melbourne/Brisbane) is a weird way to describe Australia's population distribution. Perth is basically the same size as Brisbane. "We still only really live in two/four/five cities" all would be more accurate.