In America it’s protected.
We have a jurisprudence that allows Neo-Nazis to March through Jewish neighborhoods.
Our public sphere is extremely permissive. So permissive that avoiding the public sphere is necessary to avoid anti-social behavior.
For example: You're upset that Nazis marched through a Jewish neighborhood. Are you upset about the violent BLM protestors marching through White neighborhoods? I would guess not but there's little difference between the two.
I've moved to places to see if I thought the changes improved things, you learn a lot about yourself and the world by doing that.
But that’s different from Nazis going around on a subway screaming racial insults at passengers.
For many passengers that would make the subway unusable.
Remember this thread is ultimately about “why public transit is better than people having cars.”
Antisocial behavior is a disadvantage of public transit, and in some cases makes it unusable.
I think keeping this conversation focused around public transit is a good idea.
Public transit is one of the few public spaces we have left, ironically. Perhaps especially so post-Covid. I think that it's worth the investments necessary to make it usable. You can't blame public transit for the lack of effectiveness of homeless programs, and some folks are homeless by choice. It's a fraught situation, and that's why folks choose cars a lot of the time. It's more convenient for them and I guess I don't fault folks for that, but the built environment shows a lot of deference for cars in many metro areas, and that doesn't help with the traffic issues, or with zoning issues, or with housing affordability.
Yet, if you improve those other issues, then property values will probably just go up even higher than they already are, but at least that money will benefit more than just the buyer and the seller; it will benefit the entire community.