Re:Researchers Found Puberty Blockers Didn’t Improve Trans K...
by zozbot234 on Thursday April 07, 2022 @03:14PM
(#30949087)
A proper control group should be defined as the state-of-the-art alternative, not as "no treatment". The latter is a common ploy used to push substandard, "me too" treatments.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Researchers Found Puberty Blockers Didn’t Improve Trans K...
by notahacker on Thursday April 07, 2022 @03:34PM
(#30949339)
What's the "state of the art alternative" to address gender dysphoria in adolescents? Certainly the alternative to puberty blockers or hormones most often advocated is doing nothing.
The author makes some perfectly reasonable points about flaws in the study like the large and uneven number of dropouts from the study, likelihood of confounding factors in the nonrandom selection process and oddities in its construction to the extent I'm not sure the study itself can be used as firm evidence of anything, but his insistence that the treatment group not getting worse like the control group can't be evidence for it being beneficial isn't justified either.
Re:Researchers Found Puberty Blockers Didn’t Improve Trans K...
by temp8964 on Thursday April 07, 2022 @03:19PM
(#30949146)
Shouldn't the control group get placebo treatment? Simply by knowing they have been "treated" could already make them feel better. When the effect you are looking for is a psychological effect, it is even more serious a research design problem.