Re:Robot scientist finds less than one third of scientific r...
by smegsicle on Thursday April 07, 2022 @01:39PM
(#30947825)
paraphrase of the director of the national institute of allergy and infectious diseases
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Robot scientist finds less than one third of scientific r...
by smegsicle on Thursday April 07, 2022 @02:23PM
(#30948424)
https://html.duckduckgo.com/html?q=fauci%20%22trust%20the%20...
erroneously referring to academia as 'science', but it can't be interpreted any other way
Re:Robot scientist finds less than one third of scientific r...
by nitwit005 on Thursday April 07, 2022 @04:47PM
(#30950140)
I went through the first 8 results or so, and none of them actually provide a quote of someone saying that. Rather, they seem mostly critiques of the mantra, which I assume was being used on Facebook and things at the time most of those articles were written.
Re:Robot scientist finds less than one third of scientific r...
by slothtrop on Thursday April 07, 2022 @03:55PM
(#30949610)
Sounds like the error is yours. Trusting science isn't tantamount to trusting academia.
Re:Robot scientist finds less than one third of scientific r...
by smegsicle on Thursday April 07, 2022 @04:27PM
(#30949931)
science is a process, not an assertion of the correctness of a certain viewpoint
'trusting science' is a paradoxical phrase, and when used in the context of coercing behavior and thought in a particular direction is anti-science, no matter how peer-reviewed and authority-supported that direction is