Re:In defense of simple architectures
by surfer7837 on Wednesday April 06, 2022 @04:00PM
(#30936818)
Just boils down to not optimising until you need to. Start with a 3 tier web app (unless your requirements lead you to another solution), then start with read replicas, load balancing, sharding, redis/RabbitMQ etc
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Realistically almost every web app can start as a one-tier web app that uses SQLite as a data store and serves mostly HTML.
I have a dumb question ...
In almost all performance areas -- gaming, PCs, autos, etc -- there are usually whole publications dedicated to performing benchmarks and publishing those results.
Are there any publications or sites which implement a few basic applications against various new-this-season "full stacks" or whatnot, and document performance numbers and limit-thresholds on different hardware?
Likewise, there must be stress-test frameworks out there. Are there stress-test and scalability-test third-party services?
Fossil SCM is a great example of a sqlite application that has stood the test of time. I don't know what sqlite.org's traffic is like, but it's not tiny and it runs on a tiny VPS without issue(and has for years now).
Re:In defense of simple architectures
by SpikeMeister on Wednesday April 06, 2022 @06:07PM
(#30938059)
TechEmpower has benchmarks for different web stacks: https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/
Unfortunately TE is highly gamified, and the benchmarks (like most benchmarks!) don't really represent real-world workloads.
True, but it's great that they have a certain comparable hello-world set, so you can just take the 2-n benchmarks for the tech you're interested in and either ungamify it or just implement your own prototype and measure. The benefit of already having a non-random-tutorial-from-google app is a huge win to me personally.