News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dart language by rdtsc on Monday October 10, 2011 @07:48AM (#3093352)
> I was hoping for something more like Python.

Me too! We already have a very readable, simple and elegant language, let's use that. Anyone know why that wouldn't have worked? (Not using the current CPython implementation but maybe the same syntax but with a different (web-only) set of libraries, that is...)

Re:Dart language by nailer on Monday October 10, 2011 @08:04AM (#3093389)
That's almost exactly what coffeescript is.

With Source Mapping in browsers, it also means you'll be able to get a .coffee line in your tracebacks too.

Re:Dart language by rdtsc on Monday October 10, 2011 @08:39AM (#3093500)
I agree. Yes, I would have liked to just have coffeescript as their new language. Maybe they could have just supported direct native execution on Chrome. Maybe Firefox would have followed.
Re:Dart language by LeafStorm on Monday October 10, 2011 @10:59AM (#3094029)
CoffeeScript solves most of the problems with JavaScript's syntax, but the problem they're trying to solve here isn't the syntax, it's the structure and semantics.
Re:Dart language by rayiner on Monday October 10, 2011 @10:18PM (#3096791)
Because Python's semantics are fucktarded.