Re:One App – Two Worlds: This Is TikTok in Russia and Ukraine
by karatinversion on Tuesday April 05, 2022 @11:59AM
(#30920643)
My take, which is less a paradox and more of a "bitter lesson", is that increases in ability to communicate always lead to increases in centralisation, for the types of reasons you indicate.
The early internet's utopianism took place in the window when the new ability to communicate had not yet been used to effect the new centralisation.
Re:One App – Two Worlds: This Is TikTok in Russia and Ukraine
by KarlKemp on Tuesday April 05, 2022 @01:21PM
(#30921894)
Yes, absolutely; reading the NYT or WSJ twice a week and never touching another news source will make you better informed than consuming the out[ut of a hundred YouTube channels and Twitter feeds you have chosen because you enjoy their opinions.
Diversifying your news sources is a poor form of hedging. What we should encourage people to do is trying to come up with methods to increase trust: can you think of a way to verify some snippet of news from first principle?
With information and media, lots of us originally thought that lowering barriers to entry for media dissemination would make it easier to have this "global village of a billion voices". But instead what it has done is made it easier for users to filter to the top content, and easier for producers to use tons of data mining and machine learning to filter in on the most addictive (if definitely not the best) content. In the long term it can make it harder for smaller producers because they are competing against a much larger set of competitors for attention.