News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mastodon: A free, open-source, and decentralized Twitter ... by chefandy on Monday April 04, 2022 @11:52PM (#30915131)
In an alternate Twitter-free universe if someone wanted a noun/verb for a deliberately lightweight communication broadcast into the ether over the internet, I'd bank a grand on marketers agreeing that a cheerful, sharp little chirp from a nimble, energetic bird communicates that better than the plaintive sounding crescendo of a giant plodding extinct earthbound mammal which also is outdated slang for a fart.

Mastodons are cool and everything but they don't work for branding a social network. Some rad groundbreaking online museum or library or something else that wanted to viscerally communicate age and wisdom and weight and timelessness? Sure.

Re:Mastodon: A free, open-source, and decentralized Twitter ... by wallfacer120 on Thursday April 07, 2022 @02:48AM (#30941396)
I think the negative reaction to the word toot has little to do with the relative uncoolness of the mastadon, I think the issue is that toot has a scatological association.
Re:Mastodon: A free, open-source, and decentralized Twitter ... by chefandy on Thursday April 07, 2022 @10:21PM (#30952645)
Not what I’m saying. Toot’s self-evident, multifaceted dorkiness is the most concrete reason people find mastodon uncool. I wouldn’t trust a designer’s cobbled together code for a production project; likewise, developers should delegate these things to domain specialists when image is important. These commenters, largely developers, confidently discounting the importance of visceral appeal in social environments is yet more evidence.

I get that many developers had/have a toxic experience with the concept of coolness, but that doesn’t negate its functionality in this vein.