I guess that the "appeal" was ruled reasonable and zuby made it back? Of course Washington Examiner will never follow up on the matter as they're well known, like Fox, to print front page knee jerks and way-back-page retractions.

Washington Examiner is not known for its accurate reporting. [0]

[0] https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/

Sure, but it doesn’t change what I wrote. In fact your non-peer reviewed site had this to say about CNN:

“ CNN typically utilizes loaded emotional words in sensational headlines such as this: Trump pounces on Justice Department report findings.”

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/left/cnn-bias/

So are we gonna be biased or call every guilty party out?

So you're saying, "What about CNN?" then? [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

Or just disproving your statement. Depending on your mental capacity.

Or was your statement made such that only the right wing makes such headlines?

Or are you russian and just trying to sow division?

Which is it?

Also you still didn’t change what I said, just avoided it by trying to claim “whataboutism”. Fight it all you want, it’s not going to change the truth.

Which statement does, "What about CNN?" disprove?

Your implication that only Fox spits out clickbait. You seem to be dead set on hiding behind whataboutism and ignoring the facts. You want to smear Fox’s name, but fight veraciously to defend CNN. That’s all anybody needs to know, and is clearly on display in your comments here.