L.A. judge rules LGBT corporate diversity law unconstitutional

Re:L.A. judge rules LGBT corporate diversity law unconstitut... by inetknght on Saturday April 02, 2022 @05:03PM (#30891655)

> Why would anybody pro abortion?

There are many reasons.

In the case that carrying a fetus to term would kill the mother: abort. One life does not merit the safety of another.

In the case that a fetus was conceived in rape: abort. Would you remind yourself, and even be beholden to, evil?

In the case that a fetus would be born unwanted: abort. It is better to be born into a loving family than raised in orphanages or worse: raised in a family who do not love you.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:L.A. judge rules LGBT corporate diversity law unconstitut... by temp8964 on Saturday April 02, 2022 @05:14PM (#30891740)

Why do you need those reasons? It doesn't like pro-abortion, it's anti-abortion by limiting its use cases. If you are pro-abortion, you would happily suggest any pregnant women to abort their babies.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:L.A. judge rules LGBT corporate diversity law unconstitut... by inetknght on Saturday April 02, 2022 @07:29PM (#30892617)

> Why do you need those reasons?

I don't. You asked why would anyone. I just presented some reasons that I know my lady friends have stated.

I do, in fact, think that you don't "need" any reason whatsoever. I think a woman has every right to choose whether or not to have a baby including to abort a baby for any reason or even for no reason.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:L.A. judge rules LGBT corporate diversity law unconstitut... by anamax on Saturday April 02, 2022 @06:32PM (#30892261)

There are multiple groups who advocate abortion for "those people." (Different groups have different definitions of "those people.")

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:L.A. judge rules LGBT corporate diversity law unconstitut... by oneoff786 on Saturday April 02, 2022 @05:50PM (#30891986)

Overly literal semantic argument. Uninteresting

[ Parent | on HN ]