L.A. judge rules LGBT corporate diversity law unconstitutional

Re:L.A. judge rules LGBT corporate diversity law unconstitut... by car_analogy on Saturday April 02, 2022 @04:58PM (#30891625)

I'm the only one that presented any data at all - the original comment simply asserted something was true, without backing it up in any way.

It's reasonable to expect a refutation to contain at least some data, instead of dismissing what data we do have as not complete enough, and reverting back to the original fact-free assertion.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:L.A. judge rules LGBT corporate diversity law unconstitut... by stormbrew on Saturday April 02, 2022 @05:08PM (#30891685)

You can't just throw up a data table and go "ok I refuted it!" That's not an argument, it's just some contextless numbers. It is legitimately not clear to me in any way what you're trying to say or what it has to do with the thing you're replying to.

[ Parent | on HN ]