L.A. judge rules LGBT corporate diversity law unconstitutional

Re:L.A. judge rules LGBT corporate diversity law unconstitut... by throwawaydem45 on Saturday April 02, 2022 @04:38PM (#30891477)

Why are these push backs always associated with Republicans? Only 40% of CA democrats voted for Prop 16, for example, which would have reinstated affirmative action in CA public schools (it's currently prohibited in California, as decided by vote). That's a large percentage of Democrats against non-merit-based college admissions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:L.A. judge rules LGBT corporate diversity law unconstitut... by nullc on Saturday April 02, 2022 @04:59PM (#30891630)

Perhaps contemplate the reasons you have for using a throwaway account to ask this question and you may be enlightened.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:L.A. judge rules LGBT corporate diversity law unconstitut... by throwawaydem45 on Saturday April 02, 2022 @05:25PM (#30891812)

Indeed. That's a separate issue for society to examine.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:L.A. judge rules LGBT corporate diversity law unconstitut... by leereeves on Saturday April 02, 2022 @06:51PM (#30892379)

I think nullc is subtly pointing out that if Democrats are afraid to publicly oppose these policies, it will of course seem like all the push back is coming from Republicans.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:L.A. judge rules LGBT corporate diversity law unconstitut... by nullc on Saturday April 02, 2022 @07:22PM (#30892578)

Exactly.

[ Parent | on HN ]