News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The smallest and worst HDMI display by NikolaNovak on Thursday March 31, 2022 @06:25PM (#30872909)
I'm assuming that our ability to computationally aid / resolve signal is far higher than voyager's.
Re:The smallest and worst HDMI display by phire on Thursday March 31, 2022 @09:09PM (#30874126)
That's a factor, but I think it's more that there was never a need for large data uplinks to Voyager, while they needed to downlink large amounts of science data.

The uplink and downlink are in different frequency bands, S-band (2-4ghz) for uplink and X-band (8-12ghz) for downlink and have different amounts of radio frequency bandwidth allocated.

Additionally, Voyager's High-gain antenna has a much narrower beamwidth in X-band at 0.5°, compared to 2.3° for S-band, though I have no idea if that's a factor.

Re:The smallest and worst HDMI display by jamiek88 on Thursday March 31, 2022 @07:21PM (#30873391)
Plus receiver size.
Re:The smallest and worst HDMI display by johnwalkr on Friday April 01, 2022 @12:30AM (#30875209)
It’s mainly this and it’s normal for spacecraft (especially in deep space) to have orders of magnitude more datarate on downlink.