News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Missing wheat from the war is less than 1% of global whea... by randomdata on Thursday March 31, 2022 @12:15PM (#30868875)
> This aligns with every single combat photo I've seen thus far. I don't think I've seen one field of winter wheat.

1. How many photos from the war have you seen of farmland? It's not exactly the prime battleground.

2. We can assume that you can recognize winter wheat at this stage from photos not focused on the crop? It, of course, looks like someone's dead lawn when it first emerges from it's winter rest. Hard to differentiate from any other grassy area unless the photo has a lot of detail.

On that note, I started looking at some random pictures after I read your comment. I came across this one[1] of a field. Wheat or no in your opinion? In my opinion as a winter wheat grower: I have no idea. Maybe.

[1] https://asianatimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/XFXJX6VK3...

Re:Missing wheat from the war is less than 1% of global whea... by log1_aa on Thursday March 31, 2022 @04:45PM (#30872004)
The photo shows pasture land, not winter wheat. The wheat crop in Ukraine is almost 100% winter wheat that is planted in the fall. Source: https://www.fas.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-03/Ukraine...
Re:Missing wheat from the war is less than 1% of global whea... by randomdata on Thursday March 31, 2022 @05:01PM (#30872165)
While I tend to agree, especially since the photo appears to be of military training and not actual combat, here[1] is a photo of known winter wheat. This photo was taken a little bit later in the year, so the leaf is more pronounced and greener than you'd expect of the current crop, but even then is the casual observer looking for pictures of war going to notice? They really don't look all that different to me without stopping to really study the details and the first photo doesn't have much detail to work with. I would bet that this[2] is a field of wheat seeded into soybean stubble, but how can you really tell for sure?

[1] https://imgur.com/a/MII3Sc1

[2] https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FPMuO-OXwAsWAuU?format=jpg

Re:Missing wheat from the war is less than 1% of global whea... by nkurz on Thursday March 31, 2022 @06:29PM (#30872943)
I was going to ask you when it is typically harvested, but thought I'd check the page you helpfully linked:

Winter wheat accounts for about 97 percent of Ukraine’s total wheat production. It is planted from early September to mid-November and harvested between July and September.

So depending on what happens with the invasion, it seems possible that a substantial portion might still be harvested on schedule.

Re:Missing wheat from the war is less than 1% of global whea... by anonAndOn on Thursday March 31, 2022 @03:41PM (#30871444)
1. Hundreds. Twitter and Telegram are your best bet for field kills.

2. Does it? I've never seen a lawn planted in 7-8" rows.

Regardless of the species of plant in the photo, does that look like a tilled field to you?

Re:Missing wheat from the war is less than 1% of global whea... by randomdata on Thursday March 31, 2022 @04:22PM (#30871802)
> Does it? I've never seen a lawn planted in 7-8" rows.

I've never seen 7.5" rows be row-able at that stage unless you line yourself up just perfectly. Given that the photographers aren't focused on the crop itself, what are the chances? With sufficient resolution of the photo maybe you can still tell, but someone's random cell phone photo isn't going to give you that. Even a top of the line camera scaled down to web resolutions is going to lose that information.

> Regardless of the species of plant in the photo, does that look like a tilled field to you?

No, but why would you till it? Wheat is the easiest crop to no-till out there. Even the moldboard mafia no-till their wheat. You'd have to be dealing with some heavy compaction or other issues with the land to justify that fuel burn just to grow poverty grass.