Re:Britain being forced to go cashless 'against its will'
by hatefulmoron on Thursday March 31, 2022 @01:50AM
(#30864219)
> Because once you donate money, you have given it away, and it's gone.
Presumably to the entity you intended to donate to, no? I would argue that determining where your money goes is a right.. If I intercepted all of your future charitable donations for my own purposes you would be understandably upset.
Re:Britain being forced to go cashless 'against its will'
by luciusdomitius on Thursday March 31, 2022 @04:24AM
(#30865014)
Great. So, stealing from charity is now ethical. Good to know !!!
Re:Britain being forced to go cashless 'against its will'
by fennecfoxy on Friday April 01, 2022 @09:30AM
(#30877865)
Ha ha, so easy to refute. Is it unethical for the government to stop me from say, donating to a terrorist organisation? It's still "charity", right? ;)
Re:Britain being forced to go cashless 'against its will'
by leach on Friday April 01, 2022 @04:19PM
(#30882867)
if we really want to get dirty with things aren't you already doing that through taxes? black budgets and such?
also what constitutes a terrorist? its easy to say ISIS is terrorism, but are the truckers or January 6th people considered terrorists?
if so then BLM can be considered terrorists, and then how come they never got their donations seized?
deep rabbit hole with no way out
Re:Britain being forced to go cashless 'against its will'
by kurisufag on Thursday March 31, 2022 @07:46AM
(#30866113)
donation are purchases -- you are buying capital for the fund of your choice.
if it turned out a charity you donated to was funneling money somewhere, they would be effectively stealing from you, as the thing you were purchasing was never given.
Punishment would involve having something further taken away. If they jailed people for donating, that would be punishment.