Re:Waymo begins driverless rides in San Francisco
by dont__panic on Wednesday March 30, 2022 @11:56AM
(#30856937)
> special lanes or highways just for automated tractor trailers.
I know that there's last-mile advantages to this compared to what already exists, but god damn I just cannot get over the fact that we've just reinvented trains with a much larger environmental impact.
Re:Waymo begins driverless rides in San Francisco
by clairity on Wednesday March 30, 2022 @12:23PM
(#30857352)
the way to think of these is as instantly reconfigurable trains. in an ideal market, an enterprising entreprenuer would be able to install tracks on the most used routes and lower costs (and emissions). but we've long succumbed to corruption and financialization in markets (note that if risk is priced properly, capital wouldn't need to evaluate opportunities deeply, but would rather take every NPV-positive project available, in order of expected returns, in a large and diverse enough portfolio to mitigate systemic risk).
Re:Waymo begins driverless rides in San Francisco
by micromacrofoot on Wednesday March 30, 2022 @12:16PM
(#30857248)
but they’re cheaper at first
Re:Waymo begins driverless rides in San Francisco
by jacquesm on Wednesday March 30, 2022 @11:51AM
(#30856856)
That is in my opinion the way to go with this, to either adapt the infrastructure to make it work or to at least separate the self driving traffic and the 'normal' traffic so the two won't interfere.
I can't say for taxis, but according to the newspapers, Texas has been running automated tractor trailers between Dallas and Houston (about 230 miles) for at least a year, and at least one other state has been doing it for at least two years. (Possibly Nevada, between Vegas and either Reno or Phoenix. But my memory is fuzzy on that, and I have zero confidence in Google.)
Texas has also been thinking about building special lanes or highways just for automated tractor trailers.