> As for humility: you will not find it in most sub 40 year olds, they don't know what they don't know yet
This is interesting and very different from my experience. I feel like humility is actually the hardest thing to find in anyone (controlled for age and all). I haven't actually seen a clear trend line between humility and age.
> Adding 'hungry' also seems to select for people in need, giving you an advantage over them in negotiations.
Interesting I never really thought about it like this. Do you associate "hungry" with "desperate"? I've always seen them as completely distinct, but, if enough people see them as closely related, I probably should figure out how to qualify this.
Also, keep in mind that my viewpoint is Euro-centric and that just that alone could easily qualify to make up the difference.
As for terminology, eager might be a better term than hungry.
> As for terminology, eager might be a better term than hungry. So funny, I associate eager more with "desperate". Maybe this is a US vs. EU sorta thing. I'm going to noodle on this - thank you!
I don't see how 'humble, hungry and smart' will go together in most applicants, you'll be lucky to have one out of three, extremely happy to get two and all three is usually a question of broken self assessment.
Adding 'hungry' also seems to select for people in need, giving you an advantage over them in negotiations. As for humility: you will not find it in most sub 40 year olds, they don't know what they don't know yet. So this might cause good candidates to back out.
Finally, the extra heading 'We cannot hire within these countries' is superfluous, it is already covered by the previous heading.
hth.