Representatives toeing party lines is seen as an impoverishment to democracy.
Excess transparency means representatives will pander only for votes/money/attention, it's for example why every televised American congressional session makes you lose braincells. Because they're only talking to the TV, they're not actually deliberating.
That's how democracy works. Pandering for votes and then acting on behalf of your voters interests is kind of the point.
Im honestly kind of shocked to be reading this on HN in 2022. This is the kind of thing monarchists said in 1684.
>money
Legislative secrecy is a great way of letting money corrupt democracy since it eliminates the feedback loop between the legislator acting on behalf of monied interests and being democratically punished for it at the next election.
Important to whom, other than themselves in the next election?
(Full disclosure: In spite of what I wrote above, I did vote NOTA above all other options. I am not confident that I'm ready to change the status quo.)
What would you think about the ones that did?