Re:Reinstating our SAT/ACT requirement for future admissions...
by aj7 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @01:55AM
(#30839261)
Yes you knew what they told you. Yes they looked at for a minute. Yes, out of a class of 950, it made a difference for 20-30. But I bet, privately, they spat on it. They had plenty of experience with total nerds who founded industries or disciplines. Remember, physics, chemistry, EE, material science, that’s 40-50% of the class: physics up to quantum mechanics. Entire undergraduate body: special relativity with 4 weeks of problem sets, and derivation of the magnetic field from this. When you’re 18.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Reinstating our SAT/ACT requirement for future admissions...
by jjeaff on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:39AM
(#30840215)
I think you underestimate the number of people that have a perfect gpa and a perfect score on the sat/act. Thousands of kids get a perfect score on the sat or act test every year. MIT is going to have to be looking at more than just that.
Re:Reinstating our SAT/ACT requirement for future admissions...
by aj7 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:37PM
(#30848039)
You are right. I forgot. I wouldn’t even get in now probably.
Re:Reinstating our SAT/ACT requirement for future admissions...
by ghaff on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @03:52AM
(#30839952)
Most of the people I’ve known from MIT, and pretty much all of the interesting ones, are technically savvy but pretty much the opposite of total nerds.