Starlink plans to use mercury propellant, 100s tons expected to enter atmosphere

Re:Starlink plans to use mercury propellant, 100s tons expec... by jka on Monday March 28, 2022 @08:13PM (#30837134)

I mostly agree with you - the title of the post includes claims that aren't substantiated by the documentation, and that isn't great.

Something makes me uneasy though: a radical, risky innovation that could significantly reduce operational costs albeit at an environmental cost to be paid at a later date and/or even used as a point of leverage? It feels plausible (and dangerous) enough to warrant inquiry and consideration.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Starlink plans to use mercury propellant, 100s tons expec... by rspeed on Friday April 01, 2022 @06:05PM (#30883807)

It would increase operational costs. The satellite lifetime is limited by propellant capacity (especially at the low altitudes where Starlink operates). Mercury thrusters would be significantly less efficient than the krypton thrusters they currently use, due to Mercury's higher atomic mass.

[ Parent | on HN ]