News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't there a Google competitor emerging? by akrymski on Sunday March 27, 2022 @12:10PM (#30821373)
The only viable alternative to PageRank I know of is social search: show me results that my friends (and friends of friends and so on) liked/bookmarked.

Delicious sort of tried it but never executed well on the search side.

In a way it's a personalized PageRank algo with users linking to pages they like and to other users they follow. This always made more sense to me than a global authority ranking.

When looking for a babysitter you want recommendations from friends you trust, not some global ranking of popular babysitters.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't there a Google competitor emerging? by amirkdv on Sunday March 27, 2022 @01:41PM (#30822225)
I've heard this a lot. I think there are two problems with this. First, you need massive adoption for the "social" part to be at all useful, hence only the few big social platforms can even try it. Second, even at maximum possible adoption, you'll probably run into the problem that actual human social networks have nowhere near enough branching breadth to help rank the behemoth that the web is today, i.e. for most queries and most possible hits, there's not enough signal coming from the social network.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't there a Google competitor emerging? by akrymski on Sunday March 27, 2022 @02:12PM (#30822533)
The benefit of this approach is that it's an addition to PageRank, not a replacement. You don't need massive adoption of the social part I think cause you can link to eg HN, which already links to other sites. It's simply extending the backlinking concept to add personal pages.

Most long tail queries work well enough with Google and indeed most of the benefit of this approach would be in the head where ranking matters more. Furthermore nothing prohibits users from liking domains, not just individual URLs.