The $14B is slow and probably won't make it to individual Ukrainians. So, like in the original charge, you're stuck in the position of having to trivialize $100M in aid because ... well, other modes are helping too, and this isn't a "prime example".

>In short we can and should give more to Ukraine.

And this is a way to give direct aid, something you ostensibly want, and yet you're stuck saying crypto doesn't count, somehow.

It seems a less epicyclic approach is to just accept that this is a valid use case rather than finding a way to out-argue it.