0. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient
1. https://www.manhattanreview.com/sat-retaking/#:~:text=The%20....
So SATs are not generally trainable by a universal approach -- including personal tuition. I think that is believable. However, that for any given individual there is no intervention which will substantially improve their SAT results is a much stronger statement which I find less believable.
Most money spent on test prep is just wasted.
Consider the physical fitness correlations in the article - I don't think anyone would argue that your level of physical fitness is immutable. But just because the value is mutable is no reason to disregard the current value - it can still be a meaningful and useful indicator.
I think that thinking processes is very much in that category, and I think that the investment in time is considerable. I think its typical to expect gradual improvement -- a constant response to training. Anecdotally, it doesn't work like that.
If SAT score were measuring some immutable value, then it wouldn't be so easy to improve one's score with revision, and tutors.