A new tool for finding dark matter digs up nothing

Re:A new tool for finding dark matter digs up nothing by tux3 on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @04:42PM (#30771241)

    In 1999, the Nobel prize winning physicist Philip Warren Anderson said he is "sure that it's a fraud",[12] and in the same year another Nobel prize winning physicist, Steven Chu, called it "extremely unlikely".[23] The following year, a 2000 patent based on its hydrino-related technology[24][25] was later withdrawn by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) due to contradictions with known physics laws and other concerns about the viability of the described processes, citing Park and others.[26]

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brilliant_Light_Power

Every submission you've made seems to be about this company (https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=dave333).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A new tool for finding dark matter digs up nothing by dave333 on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @05:30PM (#30771817)

So how do these Nobel prize winners explain dark matter? Do "known physics laws" not evolve as new discoveries are made? Wikipedia is policed by skeptics that only support the status quo. IMO that article is not a fair description of Brilliant Light Power. As for my submissions, if as I believe hydrinos turn out to be real, it will be the greatest scientific discovery since the genome, so worth harping on about.

[ Parent | on HN ]