News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Updated Okta Statement on Lapsus$ by cheeze on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @02:49PM (#30769912)
I gotta say, I don't make technical decisions at the "we're using CF" level, but I've been incredibly impressed with their track record over the years. I often evangelize blog post writing and transparency at my company and this is exactly why. What a way to build trust. It's basically free advertising for technical folk by "putting their money where their mouth is."

I'd love to see more of this in the industry. CF is, IMO, industry leading here.

Re:Updated Okta Statement on Lapsus$ by londons_explore on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @04:46PM (#30771297)
Their blog posts are great, but for a service where reliability really really matters, they've had a few too many global outages.

Especially considering their core proxying service doesn't have any requirement for a globally consistent datastore, there is zero excuse for a global outage.

Re:Updated Okta Statement on Lapsus$ by tatersolid on Thursday March 24, 2022 @10:56PM (#30798187)
> doesn't have any requirement for a globally consistent datastore

How do you think they manage configuration for proxying millions of customer websites? Using a globally distributed data store.