Re:George Hotz against the institutions
by CyberRabbi on Sunday March 20, 2022 @03:25AM
(#30740831)
That’s interesting that you came away with the impression that Stallman is replaceable from my comment given my comment states in literal terms that Stallman crafted an idea that changed the world. What specific part of my comment gave you the impression that he’s replaceable?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
> What specific part of my comment gave you the impression that he’s replaceable?
I think but obviously can't confirm it might have been this bit:
> ... at least Stallman comes to mind as an example of someone who was able to change the course of history *without much personal power, instead he crafted ideas that had power.*
To me this might be construed as Stallman could be replaced by anyone, since he had little personal power and only crafted ideas; anyone could craft ideas.
I might be wrong though but that would be my guess
Re:George Hotz against the institutions
by thowaway673y on Sunday March 20, 2022 @04:05AM
(#30740983)
Exactly
> instead he crafted ideas that had power
The emphasis is on the idea rather than the individual.
This the most HN discussion I've ever seen on HN
I know, it's basically an argument about whether RMS is a god or merely a prophet.
Re:George Hotz against the institutions
by CyberRabbi on Sunday March 20, 2022 @09:09AM
(#30742321)
Nowhere in this thread is there an argument or dispute over Stallman’s status.