I'm not saying the 'legal' books shouldn't be part of the bible because they have 'no theological value'.
I'm saying that when a hollywood actor in a film makes fun of christians and says something like "oh go sacrifice a goat like it says in your bible", they are willfully misrepresenting those verses as "cherry-picking your beliefs and conveniently leaving out the goat stuff", when in fact typically they're quoting verses of legal/historical significance, rather than of a dogmatic/theological nature.
> typically they're quoting verses of legal/historical significance, rather than of a dogmatic/theological nature
This distinction dos not make sense. The laws in the Bible is literally given by God.
Hold on a minute - You lost me here - how can description of animal sacriface on na altar not have theological nature?
A good place to start is Language of Creation by Mattieu Pageau and Unseen Realm by Michael Heiser. Nothing in the Bible is there by accident. It all has meaning and connects with the rest of what's there. And the "contradictions" are there on purpose, to draw you in. Think of them like Zen koans that are inviting you into contemplation of what is meant, rather than "oh those ancient people must have missed this one".