Re:Jailed baby gene scientist ‘should be made responsible’ f...
by _3u10 on Saturday March 19, 2022 @09:17PM
(#30739111)
So this change to the DNA exists naturally and occurs without the consent of those born with it?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Jailed baby gene scientist ‘should be made responsible’ f...
by daniel-thompson on Saturday March 19, 2022 @10:02PM
(#30739352)
The change that has been studied is a naturally-occurring 32 base pair deletion of the CCR5 gene (see https://www.google.com/search?q=ccr5+delta+32). In the literature, this allele is called CCR5-Δ32, and it modifies the expression of the CCR5 protein by, among other things, eliminating the receptor used by some HIV strains.
He Jiankui intended to use CRISPR to effect CCR5-Δ32, but didn't succeed; instead, his use of CRISPR made other, never-studied-before mutations to the CCR5 gene.
Will those mutations result in a CCR5 protein which confers HIV resistance? Probably, at least to some strains, since as far as we know, the full CCR5 gene is needed for an HIV-compatible receptor on the CCR5 protein.
Will they have other effects? What is their safety profile? These mutations have never been studied before, so no one knows.
See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6813942/#__p275 for more on this.
Re:Jailed baby gene scientist ‘should be made responsible’ f...
by mensetmanusman on Sunday March 20, 2022 @07:38AM
(#30741818)
Yes, just like autism.