Microsoft Explains Why the Start Menu Needed to Die

Re:Microsoft Explains Why the Start Menu Needed to Die by CurtHagenlocher on Tuesday October 04, 2011 @10:27PM (#3073886)

<i>Honestly, there's still nothing wrong with XP.</i>

There are a number of ways in which XP is objectively less secure than successor versions of Windows.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Microsoft Explains Why the Start Menu Needed to Die by drivebyacct2 on Tuesday October 04, 2011 @10:48PM (#3073940)

That and a usability nightmare. Does anyone have a pleasant experience with the Wireless Connection manager in 2000/XP? I thought it was me until me less-than-super techy friend informed me that it plagued her and her mother and my technical father told me that he hated it with a passion as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Microsoft Explains Why the Start Menu Needed to Die by scq on Wednesday October 05, 2011 @12:32AM (#3074233)

To be fair, back then hardly anyone had WiFi.

[ Parent | on HN ]