Re:A 9-line summary of textbook physics
by ravi-delia on Saturday March 19, 2022 @10:53AM
(#30734212)
Considering that these lines specify our laws of physics only if you grant that math is a thing, you could argue that all of mathematics gets in for free ;). Sort of like how ZFC can't encode basic logic, but you still need it for axioms to make sense
Re:A 9-line summary of textbook physics
by PrettyPebble on Saturday March 19, 2022 @10:34AM
(#30734043)
Good point - but it needs computers...
Re:A 9-line summary of textbook physics
by ianbooker on Saturday March 19, 2022 @10:46AM
(#30734142)
Strangely not. You can do CS on paper, no need for a single bit-flipping device. Turing did half the field in his head / a thought experiment.
Re:A 9-line summary of textbook physics
by PrettyPebble on Saturday March 19, 2022 @11:24AM
(#30734508)
And input and ouput devices ...
Re:A 9-line summary of textbook physics
by ravi-delia on Sunday March 20, 2022 @01:07PM
(#30744421)
Then you're not really doing computer science anymore, you're doing computer engineering
Re:A 9-line summary of textbook physics
by PrettyPebble on Sunday March 20, 2022 @04:05PM
(#30746108)
OK - taken out.
I have doubts that these 9 lines describe computer science. As I interpret it, computer science is founded on pure mathematics and is not a physical or empirical science. Computer science deals with perfect abstract mathematical objects like numbers, sets, quantification, recursion, infinities, etc.