How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M

Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by zamfi on Friday March 18, 2022 @08:40PM (#30729593)

Did you miss the part about waiting 18 months for a court date?

A legal contract is only as strong as the incentives to litigate it. Doesn't seem likely a contract would've helped, it may even have existed.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by jdmichal on Saturday March 19, 2022 @05:14PM (#30737638)

If there was a contract, it probably would have helped a lot in the restraining order hearing. Which apparently had no issues happening faster than 18 months?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by zamfi on Sunday March 20, 2022 @11:50AM (#30743668)

A restraining order (at least, a temporary one) can be issued without a hearing.

[ Parent | on HN ]