News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by dionidium on Friday March 18, 2022 @07:30PM (#30728989)
What we're seeing is a return to the long-term trend. Vacancies in Manhattan have hovered around 2% for a long time.

See: https://www.millersamuel.com/files/2022/02/Feb22QNSrent-nyVA...

Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by Retric on Saturday March 19, 2022 @12:34AM (#30731059)
Which shows how important a seemingly small number of long term unoccupied apartments are.

Another way of looking at 2% vacancy is over 20 years an apartment is vacant less than 5 months. People move, die, go to prison etc, so there is some inherent friction represented in a 98% occupancy rate. Dropping to 1% long term takes more than just higher demand it would require increases in transaction efficiency.