Oh come off it, the notion of collateral damage-free missile strikes is a fantasy, and there are obvious reasons not to pursue a hot war with a nuclear power.

I never suggested that it would be collateral free... I said specifically "minimizing" the impact. That said, I don't support the practice, only making the point that there are in fact better options, including those with military action.

You can observe the difference between a military largely focused on PGMs and a military focused on 152mm artillery and unguided MLRS right now in this very war.