News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by giraffe_lady on Friday March 18, 2022 @03:42PM (#30726594)
Is my family there? My church? The park where I learned to play soccer? My daughter's best friend?

When you sit around talking about choice of living area without weighing, or even acknowledging these connections, do you realize how inhuman this sounds? Do you not have similar things binding you to a place?

Shit even specialist doctors, have you ever depended on one? If you're needing long-term specialist care you got some major shit to deal with. Rapport, trust, history with an individual doctor is an important part of that care. And people need care aside from just the doctors. Who is driving you to these appointments, caring for you afterwards? Are they coming to the new city with you?

There are a lot of things in a place you know. You can't reduce all or really very many of them down to mere transactions in a marketplace.

Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by rank0 on Friday March 18, 2022 @06:04PM (#30728120)
I feel you. It’s horrible if you’ve grown up somewhere and suddenly can’t afford a home in the same spot.

But life’s unfair. Houses get sold to the highest bidder. This is what happens when everyone wants to live in the same areas. I’m not arguing that you SHOULDNT be able to afford a home in your preferred spot. I’m observing that it’s IMPOSSIBLE for everyone to own property in their preferred spot within their budget.

You can still rent, or buy cheaper homes in cheaper areas in your city.

We can’t just will affordable housing into existence when ~97% of people live on ~3% of the land.