News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kaitai Struct: A new way to develop parsers for binary st... by lsllc on Thursday March 17, 2022 @10:17PM (#30718077)
The page covers this further down -- you can "bind" and then "use" a size [0]:

  <<Sz:8,Payload:Sz/binary-unit:8,Rest/binary>>
This bit syntax binds `Sz` as an 8-bit length value, `Payload` as `Sz` 8-bit bytes with the remainder in `Rest`.

[0] https://www.erlang.org/doc/programming_examples/bit_syntax.h...

Re:Kaitai Struct: A new way to develop parsers for binary st... by dhx on Thursday March 17, 2022 @11:35PM (#30718498)
Thanks for the example. Is there a way to perform a positive and negative look-ahead instead of just reading the remaining data to end of input?
Re:Kaitai Struct: A new way to develop parsers for binary st... by eproxus on Friday March 18, 2022 @08:04AM (#30721106)
You also have Erlang’s pattern matching at your disposal:

    decode(<<16#01, Size:8, Payload:Size/binary-unit:8, Rest/binary>>) ->
        [{field1, Payload}|decode(Rest)];
    decode(<<16#02, Flags:16, Rest/binary>>) when Flags =:= 1 ->
        [{field2, true}|decode(Rest)];
    decode(<<16#02, Flags:16, Rest/binary>>) ->
        [{field2, false}|decode(Rest)].
Anything after the when keyword is a guard condition allowing for some manner of positive/negative “look ahead” (Contrived example, but maybe you get the point).
Re:Kaitai Struct: A new way to develop parsers for binary st... by lsllc on Friday March 18, 2022 @09:11AM (#30721746)
Yes, this is exactly how you do it, with pattern matching & guards!