Re:Famous Navy UFO video was camera glare, evidence suggests
by notfbi on Wednesday March 16, 2022 @05:34PM
(#30704398)
UFO-ers were using things like the rotation speed as definitive evidence of some like other-worldly advanced technology. Demonstrating that it was the glare/gimble brings it back into the realm of just a normal far-away plane. It also casts doubt on the expertise of the pilots/military who didn't realize what happened.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Famous Navy UFO video was camera glare, evidence suggests
by zionic on Wednesday March 16, 2022 @07:22PM
(#30705458)
Except they had RADAR locks, experienced jamming, and had visual identification in some cases.
The whole “lens flare from a far away plane” hypothesis has been throughly debunked. You have to ignore evidence to reach that conclusion.
Re:Famous Navy UFO video was camera glare, evidence suggests
by notfbi on Wednesday March 16, 2022 @08:21PM
(#30705948)
Isn't the visual identification and jamming from other events?
Can you share where it is best thoroughly debunked? The stuff linked so far in this thread (Friedman podcast; pilot Lehto analysis) isn't good.