News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Plasticity Is CAD for Artists. Parent comment

Re:Plasticity Is CAD for Artists by nkallen on Wednesday March 16, 2022 @06:06AM (#30697016)
Please correct me if I’m wrong but I was not under that impression

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5419923/can-gpl-be-re-li...

I thought I am the copyright owner and I can offer my code under as many licenses as I want. Many people dual license gpl code is my understanding. Converting my own code to mit should be allowed right?

Every Google result I’ve found says I’m the copyright owner and I can offer as many licenses as I want. Are you just trolling?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Plasticity Is CAD for Artists by mintplant on Wednesday March 16, 2022 @06:12AM (#30697046)
Correct, the commenter you're replying to appears to be completely misinformed.
[ Parent | on HN ]