News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On Being Indispensable by scarface74 on Wednesday March 16, 2022 @05:59AM (#30696977)
If I’m working for a private company. Guess how much I care about “equity” that will statistically be meaningless?

On the other hand, I did implementations as a Senior Develop/de facto “cloud architect” that moved the needle meaningfully at a company with $5 million in revenue. Those same types of implementations happen multiple times daily at a company worth over $1 trillion. Nothing I’m going to ever do will ever have a meaningful affect on the stock price of the company I work at now.

Re:On Being Indispensable by FeepingCreature on Wednesday March 16, 2022 @06:02AM (#30696992)
Kind of sounds like the company share price is too coarse-grained. That sort of thing might work better if the company was split into separately traded sub-units, of which the parent company owns some controlling fraction of voting shares. Admittedly the bureaucratic overhead starts being awkward.
Re:On Being Indispensable by scarface74 on Wednesday March 16, 2022 @06:16AM (#30697065)
There are four companies worth over 1 trillion. How could you split any of them in a way that my small implementations by their standards would make a difference? I purposefully focus on the “nose of the camel in the tent” type work.

I like smaller proof of concept + training type projects.

Re:On Being Indispensable by FeepingCreature on Wednesday March 16, 2022 @06:27AM (#30697123)
I agree there is not necessarily a good way to do this in any given company structure. However, if a company can figure out how to do it, other things being equal I would expect it to eat its competitors' lunch. (As with how Uber doesn't need to mandate that drivers should be nice; it just falls naturally out of the incentive structure.)