I think the middle ground is to have a huge stash of savings. That way, the original proposition isn't really relevant anymore. (That proposition being, I need to be valuable so I don't get fired).
Presumably the goal is to be nominally replaceable, but just so all-around awesome they’d be sore to lose you.
Easy, right?
Re:On Being Indispensable
by scarface74 on Wednesday March 16, 2022 @06:05AM
(#30697010)
I worked at 3 companies between 2014-2020. My goal going in was to solve the set of problems I was hired to solve by the then new manager and “put myself out of job”.
Today working in a consulting department, I refuse to take on any work that may look like “staff augmentation”. I just do project based implementations with a definition of done and set aside time for training the customer.
So, I want to be personally valuable to the company - maybe more valuable than the average engineer - but I don't want to have indispensable knowledge that locks me in place. Surely there's a middle ground here?