Re:CIA black site detainee served as training prop to teach ...
by rendall on Tuesday March 15, 2022 @05:26PM
(#30691962)
Cops beat people quite often in the US, and exactly zero-point-never times is it to save the life of a child. Yet for some reason, you find it necessary to bring up that one time in New Zealand to justify torture. I'm sorry, but I find that baffling. Seems to me very much not tuned to reality, but maybe we should just agree to disagree here.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:CIA black site detainee served as training prop to teach ...
by ALittleLight on Tuesday March 15, 2022 @05:59PM
(#30692399)
The original comment of yours that I replied to says that "torture = bad" and that all that separates good and bad people is principle. I have two reasons for challenging this. First, it's just not true. Torture, in some cases, is completely justified. These cases are both hypothetical (you need to find the dirty bomb going to kill millions) and real (beat a car thief to save a child). Second is to question the underlying principle that makes torture usually immoral.
Re:CIA black site detainee served as training prop to teach ...
by rendall on Tuesday March 15, 2022 @06:25PM
(#30692751)
I can ask it no clearer: Given that your counterfactual is an exceedingly rare edge case, why do you feel it is important to counter the valuable moral heuristic of "torture=bad"? What are you gaining by doing that?
Re:CIA black site detainee served as training prop to teach ...
by ALittleLight on Tuesday March 15, 2022 @06:44PM
(#30692933)
If I said "All prime numbers are odd" I would not question what you gain by bringing up the example of 2.