News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is Haskell the Cure? by pjscott on Monday October 03, 2011 @05:43PM (#3068235)
In case anybody is wondering: both Erlang and Haskell have very lightweight user-space threads built in, which are mapped onto a small pool of OS threads to take advantage of however many cores you have. It's very slick and fast, and probably the Right Thing.
Re:Is Haskell the Cure? by gtani on Tuesday October 04, 2011 @12:07PM (#3071535)
Yes, there's also akka which is being incorporated as scala standard lib, and F# MailboxProcessor. The thing is that erlang/OTP and its behaviors have many people pounding on heavily loaded apps in production and improving its toolchain, whereas GHC and akka have recently (last couple years I think) been working ot get the stack working: dispatchers and load balancing (like erland reds), and bring GC up to snuff
Re:Is Haskell the Cure? by pjscott on Tuesday October 04, 2011 @08:05PM (#3073572)
Akka looks pretty sweet, but it looks like you still have to worry about blocking code in external libraries. In Haskell (and Erlang, IIRC), blocking code is deferred to a background thread automatically so you don't have to be consciously on-guard for it. You also get proper pre-emptive multithreading, while Akka looks like a hybrid of an event loop and a thread pool.

Is this a substantial headache with Akka, in practice?

Re:Is Haskell the Cure? by gtani on Wednesday October 05, 2011 @10:51AM (#3075868)
(late reply)

it's pretty hard to google akka deployments but:

http://www.quora.com/What-companies-are-using-Akka-commercia...

http://groups.google.com/group/akka-user/browse_thread/threa...

and in terms of memory overheads and how many erlang process-type things you can spin up:

http://akka.io/docs/akka/1.1/scala/tutorial-chat-server.html