Re:Why is it hard to buy things that work well?
by jader201 on Tuesday March 15, 2022 @02:40AM
(#30682298)
There’s not much to disagree with here.
I simply stated my experience — I never even said my experience was right or that it is wrong to read the article, or that others should experience HN the way I do.
I’m a slow reader and don’t have time to read lengthy articles, and therefore am drawn more to discussion.
You are (likely) a quicker reader and are drawn more to articles.
There’s room for both of us in the world — and on HN (I hope).
Re:Why is it hard to buy things that work well?
by Kiro on Tuesday March 15, 2022 @03:13AM
(#30682478)
You said "I often wish HN would just allow titles to get posted and HN folks just have a discussion around that". If there's anything I can wholeheartedly say I disagree with it's that, so yes there's a lot to disagree with here.
Re:Why is it hard to buy things that work well?
by CRConrad on Sunday March 20, 2022 @09:00PM
(#30748770)
I think that was an inadvertent juxtaposition of the words "just" and "allow": the GP probably didn't mean that links to articles should be forbidden, and only subjects for discussion ("titles") should be allowed to be posted.
At least I read their comment as "I often wish HN would allow, besides links, just titles to get posted and HN folks just have a discussion around that".
Would you still wholeheartedly disagree with that, too?
Re:Why is it hard to buy things that work well?
by arc-in-space on Tuesday March 15, 2022 @02:25AM
(#30682217)
A part of the problem here is distinguishing which articles are worth reading. I may know that a Dan post is probably good, but if I saw this exact same headline taking me to a long article on <random tech news site>, I'd probably skip it and skim the comments instead, since chances are the article itself is near worthless.
I have seen many, many cases where a big portion of the top comments are either saying something similar to what the author of the article said, or they are asking a question, or raising a rebuttal, that is already addressed in the article.
Comments are short and probably have close to zero research on average. Experience may play a part, but people don't usually offer up the resume with a comment, so you have no idea if they even have credibility. And there are mountains of witticisms, anecdotes, or emotional arguments that add little to nothing of value to the conversation.
Personally, I almost always read the article and then skim the comments to see if anybody has added any thoughts I might find interesting.