Re:Medical student surgically implants Bluetooth into own ea...
by blowski on Monday March 14, 2022 @06:21PM
(#30679223)
If someone’s caught cheating in an exam, I’d say the burden of proof is on them not me. Especially if they’re intending to affect my health.
Re:Medical student surgically implants Bluetooth into own ea...
by wizzwizz4 on Monday March 14, 2022 @08:53PM
(#30680515)
> Competent professionals fudge requirements they consider to be irrelevant all the time (inb4 no true Scotsman).
That's because they know more than the people who wrote the requirements, because the requirements were written 15 years ago when the medical profession as a whole knew a lot less about $INSERT_CONDITION_HERE.
You'll also notice that those requirements are explicitly written to permit fudging. “Two or more of the below”, “most of these”, “one or more”, “or other reason” etc..
Re:Medical student surgically implants Bluetooth into own ea...
by shukantpal on Monday March 14, 2022 @05:02PM
(#30678259)
These are reasonable generalizations.
Re:Medical student surgically implants Bluetooth into own ea...
by Ensorceled on Monday March 14, 2022 @07:09PM
(#30679731)
Competent professionals don't fail standardized tests 10 times before fudging the 11th try.
You're making generalizations based on proxy information, which is basically the same thing that a test does you're just using a different set of information to key off of.
Not that there isn't some signal in the pile of noise that you're picking through but a willingness to circumvent academic requirements isn't exactly a strong indicator of performance in the field. Competent professionals fudge requirements they consider to be irrelevant all the time (inb4 no true Scotsman).