This has nothing to do with using non-Euclidean distance, though. This is a separate issue related to having features on different scales.
It was an example metric with coefficients of 1 for each feature.
The point I was making was that the different scale of the features influences the result by a lot.
That is not a proper distance function.
What do you mean? Is it not the Euclidean distance?
You use very little information about the area, because that is in the hundreds, at most thousands.