Tell HN: Exercise caution with links to archive sites
Some users comment on posts with links to various archiving sites containing copies of linked article. This is obviously welcome when linked article is a garden / behind paywall but often the article is perfectly readable with JS disabled and archive site requires running Google's, Cloudflare's JS code or worse.
Some archive sites - like archive.ph - attempt to run malicious code on viewers' devices. It seems that archive.ph's copies of various articles[1] all attempt to run at least a script from mail.ru domain that appears[2] to "harvest data from the page (references to "gender", "age", etc) and some shady-named variables like "bait". Also a function that fetches data from top-fwz1.mail.ru and then tries to submit a hidden 1px*1px form created in an iframe using this data (...)"
[1] https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
(
9 comments
| 29 points
| on HN
)
Unless your position is all intrusive analytics scripts are "malware" -- in which case I philosophically agree, but it's futile.
[0] https://hn.algolia.com/?query=archive.is&type=comment (note Algolia's exact # is nondeterministic and changes on refresh)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archive.today
(Full disclosure: I've linked many of these myself).
https://top.mail.ru/help/en/rating
> Top Mail.Ru is a statistics system for site owners. You need to get and install the counter code on the pages of your site to collect data.
you can see the same code snippet that's on archive.ph here: https://top.mail.ru/help/en/code/receive
Personally I would rather see all those archive links gone because they have the exact same problems that link shorteners did, even if they are benign today they could easily turn malicious tomorrow.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archive.today
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23316085 ("Ask HN: Who owns archive.is, and why are they trustworthy?") (2020)
OP is just a russophobic asshole.