News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Finland starts much-delayed nuclear plant, brings respite... by acchow on Saturday March 12, 2022 @06:10PM (#30655921)
This is because Finland has a population of 5.5M

Luxembourg has 1/7th the population and could run off ONE of these.

The USA has 60x the population so would need about 420 of these?

Re:Finland starts much-delayed nuclear plant, brings respite... by chii on Saturday March 12, 2022 @10:21PM (#30657591)
420 isn't an insurmountably large a number - it's 8.4 per state (lets' round it up to 10 for redundency).

at an average cost of $10 billion per plant, that's 4.2 trillion dollars. I think the US has spent more than that on the iraq war and the afganistan war - 8 trillion according to https://www.brown.edu/news/2021-09-01/costsofwar - which could've paid for these 420 plants twice over.

Re:Finland starts much-delayed nuclear plant, brings respite... by ncmncm on Sunday March 13, 2022 @09:16PM (#30667487)
Or, could build out solar, wind, and storage, leaving plenty over for universal health care, university education, clean drinking water and breathing air, mass transit projects, and even fixing bridges.

But US decided to invade Iraq and Afghanistan instead of any of those.

Re:Finland starts much-delayed nuclear plant, brings respite... by acchow on Monday March 14, 2022 @02:17PM (#30675951)
At least we've established a stable Afghanistan for generations /s